This Screen of the Week pits the PEG ratio against the P/E ratio in the quest to find the best valuation metric.
Which valuation metric is better: the PEG ratio or the P/E ratio?
Before we answer that question, let's first start with some basics.
The P/E ratio is simply: Price / Earnings
Essentially, this tells you how much an investor is willing to pay for each unit (year) of earnings. If a stock is trading at a P/E ratio of 30, it is said to be trading at 30x times its annual earnings.
In general, the lower the P/E ratio the better. A common threshold for many investors is a P/E of 20 or less. (For the record, at the time of this writing, the S&P 500 Index was trading at a P/E (using F1 Estimates) of 15.33.)
A PEG ratio is the: P/E Ratio divided by the Growth Rate
Conventional wisdom says a value of 1 or less is considered good (at par or undervalued to its growth rate), while a value of greater than 1, in general, is not as good (overvalued to its growth rate).
Many believe the PEG ratio tells a more complete story than just the P/E ratio. (The S&P at the time of this writing had a PEG ratio of 1.93.)
Let's take a look at both of these in action.
For example: a company with a P/E Ratio of 25 and a Growth Rate of 20% would have a PEG ratio of 1.25 (25 / 20= 1.25).
While a company with a P/E Ratio of 40 and a Growth Rate of 50% would have a PEG Ratio of 0.80 (40 / 50= 0.80).
Traditionally, investors would look at the stock with the lower P/E ratio and deem it a bargain (undervalued). But looking at it closer, you can see it doesn't have the growth rate to justify its P/E.
The stock with the P/E of 40, however, is actually the better bargain since its PEG ratio is lower (0.80) and is trading at a discount to its growth rate.
In other words, the lower the PEG ratio, the better the value. That's because the investor would be paying less for each unit of earnings growth.
So which one is better?
They both have their usefulness. I do like how the PEG positions the P/E ratio in relation to its growth rate to put everything into perspective.
Quite frankly, I use both, so I'm going to say it's a tie. Plus, you couldn't even create the PEG ratio without the P/E.
But, you don't have to choose one or the other. You can use both. And that's how we're using it in this week's screen.
Let's first start with:
• Zacks Rank equal to 1
(Only stocks with a Zacks Rank #1 Strong Buy can get thru.)
• Projected One Year Growth Rate greater than S&P 500
(Market outperformers are what we're looking for. The 1 year projected growth rate for the S&P is currently 7.94%. So only those above that will qualify.)
• P/E Ratio (using F1) less than or equal to 20 AND less than or equal to X Industry Median
(Not only do we want our P/Es to be below their classic valuation threshold, but we want them to be below the median for their industry as well.)
• PEG Ratio less than or equal to 1 AND less than or equal to X Industry Median
(P/E divided by its (F1) projected growth rate. This one also has to be below its classic valuation marker and have a PEG ratio below the median for its industry. This ensures that they are considered undervalued on an absolute basis as well as undervalued relative to its group of peers.)
• Price greater than or equal to $5
• Avg. 20 Day Volume greater than or equal to 100,000
This screen will find stocks with market beating growth rates, yet still be considered undervalued on two of the most effective valuation markers. And of course, with the Zacks Rank added to it, each one of these picks will be experiencing upward earnings estimate revisions, which provides a timely catalyst for the stock to move.
Here are 5 stocks from this week's list, along with their P/E ratio (using F1 Estimates) and their PEG ratio (using F1 Projected Growth Rates):
Click on the interactive chart to view data over time.
1. Gilead Sciences Inc. (GILD, Earnings, Analysts, Financials): Engages in the discovery, development, and commercialization of therapeutics for the treatment of life threatening diseases worldwide. Market cap at $161.91B, most recent closing price at $110.17.
P/E: 10.0; PEG: 0.46
P/E: 11.29; PEG: 0.56
3. Outerwall Inc. (OUTR, Earnings, Analysts, Financials): Provides automated retail solutions primarily in the United States, Canada, Puerto Rico, Ireland, and the United Kingdom. Market cap at $1.42B, most recent closing price at $77.07.
P/E 9.19; PEG: 0.77
P/E: 18.11; PEG: 0.86
5. Wabash National Corp. (WNC, Earnings, Analysts, Financials): Engages in the design, manufacture, and marketing of truck trailers and related transportation equipment primarily in North America. Market cap at $984.16M, most recent closing price at $14.49.
P/E: 12.44; PEG: 0.56
Analyze These Ideas: Getting Started
- Read descriptions for all companies mentioned
- Access a performance overview for all stocks in the list
- Compare analyst ratings for the companies mentioned
- Compare analyst ratings to annual returns for stocks mentioned
- Real-Time Opinion: Scan the latest tweets about these companies (feed will open in a new window)
Dig Deeper: Access Company Snapshots, Charts, Filings
- Gilead Sciences Inc.(GILD, Chart, Download SEC Filings)
- Lionbridge Technologies Inc.(LIOX, Chart, Download SEC Filings)
- Outerwall Inc.(OUTR, Chart, Download SEC Filings)
- Silicon Motion Technology Corp.(SIMO, Chart, Download SEC Filings)
- Wabash National Corp.(WNC, Chart, Download SEC Filings)
© Kapitall, Inc. All rights reserved. Kapitall Wire is a division of Kapitall, Inc. Kapitall Generation, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Kapitall, Inc.
Kapitall Wire offers free cutting edge investing ideas, intended for educational information purposes only. It should not be construed as an offer to buy or sell securities, or any other product or service provided by Kapitall Inc., and its affiliate companies.
Open a free account today get access to virtual cash portfolios, cutting-edge tools, stock market insights, and a live brokerage platform through our affiliated company, Kapitall Generation, LLC.